| theCultFigurine's profiletheCultFigurinePhotosBlogLists | Help |
theCultFigurinei will spit until i learn how to speak 1/4/2007 I wanna go back to 2006Among other things, work has some pretty craptacular aspects right now, and now my yoga instructor is being forced (financially) to shut down her studio and quit teaching for a while.
Crap. I might "go dark" in this space for a while. We'll see. 12/31/2006 Taking stock of 2006: AlbumsAs must be obvious to you, I enjoy making pretentious lists at the end of the year. Note, of course, this list only reflects what I liked from among the albums we bought this year - a tiny fraction of what was released in the genres we like, and a considerably tinier fraction of what was released in all genres. Anyway here's what I've liked best that was released in 2006: Top 5 (in order)
Honorable Mention (no particular order)
Here are the year-end lists of KEXP's djs. Yeah, you can tell that it's pretty much the only station I listen to. 12/29/2006 Taking stock of 2006: Live MusicWe saw lots of great shows this year, it's been fun looking back over my reviews. Let's get right to the top 5:
Honorable mentions:
12/28/2006 I must be getting oldBecause I truly cannot understand the logic behind videotaping yourself assaulting someone and then posting that video on the internets.
But what is REALLY disturbing me in this article is this little aside:
Is that really true? It's a crime to use a cell phone on school grounds in New Jersey??? Markus Naslund is a big Swedish phonyI've known that for years. LCS Hockey finally caught up with me.
My dudely brainI just finished taking a "brain sex" quiz at the BBC science website and found out that I'm slightly dudely:
I think my dudeliness stems from my mathiness - I scored 16/20 on one set of spatial reasoning problems, and 12/12 on a set of 3-D shapes rotation problems (this second score was so high, they suggested I had transcended gender and was likely to have a science/engineering background - true!). Naturally, I still have a lot of babeliciousness too - I scored high in empathy, in the ability to discern emotions from looking at people's eyes, and in verbal fluency. I also prefer men with masculinized faces, and my ring and index fingers are nearly the same length. I'm so cool. 12/27/2006 InStyle idiocy of the month: November 2006 and December 2006I'm finally making good on my threat to poke some fun at the cultural directives in InStyle magazine (thanks for the nudge, Wendy...). I've still got the November and December issues on hand, and am currently reading January's. Wheeee! For this first post, I'm lazily choosing the most obvious idiocy that can be found in nearly every issue. Some background may be helpful. Every month, InStyle features a female celebrity, usually an actress, on the cover. The overall tone, especially when it comes to celebrities, is very upbeat. You'll never see InStyle speculating about whether an actress is pregnant or anorexic, showing her looking slovenly, or tsk-tsking over her behavior. The cover articles are uncritical puff pieces. Furthermore, the cover interview nearly always seeks to reassure the reader that female celebrities are down-to-earth and don't truly desire the success they've earned - in their hearts they belong to the traditional feminine realm. These are not uppity b!tches who use their status to threaten the status quo. These are women with conventional, socially-approved desires*. These desires are probably ones that the reader can share with the celebrity. I am often left with the impression that famous women don't really want to be famous and successful and respected profesionnally and well-paid, not really. Not deep down.
The November cover interview with Lindsay Lohan is a good illustration of this framework in action.
and of course
Lindsay is only 20 years old, which might explain the absense of one of the cover article's usual talking points. She did not state a burning desire to procreate. I assume that we'll hear that from her when she's on the InStyle cover again.
"So much for British reserve: At 31 the sublime Kate Winslet may have scored four Oscar nominations, but she prefers life unscripted -- making a pot of soup for the kids, watching Antiques Roadshow, or sharing a bit of a giggle with husband Sam"
*footnote: I don't mean to sound sneering about conventional desires. Heck, I got married and we bought a house and whatever. My point is that month after month, the formula for the cover article never changes. I am suspicious. Female celebrities seem to be under pressure to publicly affirm their gender roles at every turn. 12/22/2006 "Those people"It was only a matter of time, I suppose, when my alienation from mainstream culture would finally get me branded as one of "those people":
Here's what he's referring to. Well, ya caught me! 12/19/2006 Bizarre patterns of thinkingI just don't understand superstitious/magical "reasoning". As I mentioned recently, I'm totally obsessed with Pink Truth, a blog that claims to tell the truth behind Mary Kay, and this example of superstitious reasoning comes from a recent comment thread. One woman described her experience of sending her inventory back to MK thusly:
In essence, she's saying that because the UPS computers were down, she seriously wondered whether it was a SIGN (from God?) not to go through with returning the inventory??? THAT IS INSANE! How can people live that way? For one thing, she could just have easily reached the opposite conclusion, that the computers being down was a TEST! To see if she was really committed in her resolve to ship it back! And as Woody Allen once said, "If [God's] gonna test us, why doesn't he give us a written?"
|
|
|||
|
|